| |
WEEKLY SESSION NOTES
Senate Republican Policy Committee
Sen. Jake Corman, Chairman
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Executive Session
Nominations to Various Boards and
Commissions. (See
Attached) Confirmed: 49-0.
Wednesday,
November 28, 2007
Senate Bill 1 (Pileggi) would create the Right-to-Know Law. The
bill would specifically require a Commonwealth agency, a local agency and a
legislative agency to provide public records or legislative records in
accordance with the act. The agencies would be prohibited from denying a
requester access to a public record or legislative record due to the
intended use of the record by the requester. A judicial agency would be
required to provide financial records in accordance with the act or any rule
or order of court providing equal or greater access to the records.
Similarly, a judicial agency could not deny a requester access to a
financial record due to the intended use of the record by the requester. A
record in the possession of a Commonwealth agency or local agency would be
presumed to be a public record unless the record is exempt under Section 708
of the act, it is protected by a privilege, or it is exempt from disclosure
under any other federal or state law or regulation or judicial order or
decree. Nothing in the act would supersede or modify the public or
confidential nature of a record or document established in federal or state
law, regulation, or judicial order or decree.
The bill
would establish an Open Records Clearinghouse in the Department of Community
and Economic Development to provide information relating to implementation
of and enforcement of the act, to provide training courses, to establish an
internet website with information relating to the act, to conduct a biannual
review of the fees charged under the act, and to review appeals of decisions
by Commonwealth agencies. The clearinghouse would be required to employ or
contract with attorneys to serve as appeals officers. Each appeals officer
would be required to complete a training course. The Governor would appoint
an executive director of the clearinghouse who would serve for six years.
The executive director could not seek election or accept appointment to any
political office during his or her tenure and for one year thereafter. The
clearinghouse would have to report annually to the Governor and the General
Assembly on its activities.
All
agencies covered by the act would be required to designate an open-records
officer who would receive requests for records, direct requests to the
appropriate person, track the agency's response to the requests and maintain
the required records. The bill would require all agencies covered by the
act to designate an appeals officer to hear appeals. An agency could
promulgate regulations, rules or policies necessary to implement the act.
The following information would have to be posted at each agency and, if the
agency maintains an internet website, on the agency's website: contact
information for the open records officer, contact
information for the applicable
appeals officer, a form which could be used to file a request, and the
regulations and policies of the agency relating to the act. The
clearinghouse would be required to develop a uniform form which must be
accepted by all Commonwealth and local agencies, in addition to any form
used by the agency to file a request under the act. The uniform form would
be published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin and on the clearinghouse's
website. Judicial agencies and legislative agencies could develop their own
forms or use the one developed by the clearinghouse.
Public
records, legislative records or financial records would be available for
access during the regular business hours of an agency. An agency could make
its records available through any publicly accessible electronic means. If
a requester is unwilling or unable to use the electronic access, the
requester could submit a written request to have the record converted to
paper. The agency would be required to provide the paper version of the
record within five days of the receipt of the request. Nothing in the act
could be construed to require access to the computer of an agency or
individual employee of an agency.
An agency
could deny a requester access to a record if the requester has made repeated
requests for that same record which have placed an undue burden on the
agency. Such a denial would not restrict the ability to request a different
record. An agency could exercise discretion to make an otherwise exempt
record accessible for inspection or copying if the conditions outlined in
the bill are met. A public record that is not in the possession of an
agency but is in the possession of a party with whom the agency has
contracted to perform a governmental function, and which is directly related
to the governmental function and not otherwise exempt, would be considered a
public record. Nothing in the act could be construed to modify, rescind, or
supersede any record retention disposition schedule of an agency established
pursuant to law, regulation, policy or other directive.
If
information which is not subject to access is an integral part of a public
record, legislative record, or financial record, the agency would be
required to redact the information which is not subject to access and grant
access to the other information. Information which an agency redacts would
be considered a denial. If, in response to a request, an agency produces a
record that is not a public record, legislative record or financial record,
the agency would be required to notify any third party that provided the
record to the agency, the person that is the subject of the record and the
requester. An agency would also be required to notify, within five business
days, a third party of a request if the third party provided the record and
included a written statement that the record contains a trade secret or
confidential proprietary information. The third party would have five
business days from receipt of the notification to provide input on the
release of the record. The agency would be required to deny the request or
release the information within ten business days of the provision of notice
to the third party and notify the third party of the decision. An agency
would not be required to create a record which does not exist or to compile
a record in a manner in which the agency does not currently compile,
maintain or organize the record. The burden of proving that a public record
is exempt from public access would be on the Commonwealth or local agency
receiving the request by a preponderance of the evidence. Section 708 of
the proposed act lists the records that would be exempted from access by a
requester.
The time
to respond to a request could not exceed five business days from the date a
written request is received by an agency head or open records officer. If
the agency fails to send the response within the five business days, the
written request for access would be deemed denied. The bill provides for an
extension of the five business days if certain circumstances, such as the
need for redaction or legal review, apply. In these instances, the open
records officer would send a written notice within the five business days
notifying the requester that the request for access is being reviewed, the
reason for the review, and a reasonable date that a response is expected to
be provided. If an agency's response is a denial of a written request, a
written response would have to be issued detailing, among other information,
the specific reasons for denial, including a citation of supporting legal
authority.
A
requester could file an appeal with the clearinghouse or other appropriate
appeals officer within 15 business days of the mailing date of the agency's
response or within 15 business days of a deemed denial. The appeal would
have to state the grounds upon which the requester asserts that the record
is a public record, legislative record or financial record and address any
grounds stated by the agency for delaying or denying the request. A person
other than the agency or requester with a direct interest in the record
could file a written request to provide information. Prior to issuing a
final determination, the appeals officer could hold a hearing. A decision
to hold or not hold a hearing would not be appealable. The appeals officer
would be required to make a final decision within 30 days of the receipt of
the appeal. The bill provides for judicial review of the decision. A court
could award reasonable attorney fees and costs if it finds that an agency
willfully or with wanton disregard deprived the requester of access to a
public record or otherwise acted in bad faith; or, the exemptions,
exclusions, or defenses asserted by the agency in its final determination
were not based on a reasonable interpretation of the law. The court could
also award reasonable attorney fees and costs to the requester or agency if
it finds the legal challenge was frivolous. A court could impose a civil
penalty of not more than $1,000 if an agency denied access to a public
record in bad faith. An agency or public official who does not comply with
a court order under the act would be subject to a civil penalty of not more
than $500 per day until the public record is provided.
Fees for
duplication would be established by the clearinghouse for Commonwealth and
local agencies and by each judicial and legislative agency. The fees would
have to be reasonable and based on prevailing fees for comparable
duplication services provided by local business entities. Fees for copying
complex and extensive data sets of geographic information systems or
integrated property assessment lists could be based on consideration of
reasonable market value of the same or closely related data sets. An agency
could also establish user fees specifically for the provision of the
enhanced electronic access, but only to the extent that the enhanced
electronic access is in addition to making records accessible for inspection
and duplication as required by the act. Except as otherwise provided by
statute, no other fees could be imposed unless the agency incurs costs for
complying with the request. No fees could be imposed for an agency's review
of a record to determine if the record is a public, legislative or financial
record.
A policy,
rule or regulation adopted under the act could not limit the number of
records which may be requested or require the disclosure of the purpose or
motive for the request for access to records.
No later than May 30 of each year, a state-related university would be required
to file a report with the Governor's Office, the General Assembly, the Auditor
General, and the State Library containing the following: all information
required by Form 990 (Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax); the
salaries of all officers and directors of the state-related institution; and the
highest 25 salaries paid to employees. The report would not include information
relating to individual donors. The bill would also require Commonwealth
agencies, legislative agencies and judicial agencies to provide copies of
contracts in excess of $5,000 to the Treasury Department. The Treasury
Department would be required to make the contracts available for public
inspection either by posting a copy of the contract or a contract summary on its
website. The Treasury Department would be required to post the information in a
way that allows the public to search the contracts or the summaries. The
Treasury Department would also be required to maintain a page on its website
with instructions on how to request to review a contract and how to request a
copy of a contract. Both types of requests would have to be honored within five
business days. Copies would be provided to the requester at cost.
The bill
would repeal the existing Right-to-Know Law (Act 212 of 1957). Passed:
48-1. |