|
For Immediate
Release
6/26/07
CONTACT:
Joe Pittman
(717) 787-8724 or cell (724) 541-0552

Committee
Approves Another "Blues Merger Oversight"
HB 966 includes modified version of previous legislation
Reacting to the legislative inertia of the Rendell
Administration, the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee
today (June 28) approved yet another bill intended to
provide state oversight of proposed mergers involving
non-profit health insurance companies, according to Senator
Don White, Chairman of the Senate Banking and Insurance
Committee.
The amended version includes most of the language previously
approved by the Senate in Senate Bill 550 (Senator White's
original bill, approved by the Senate in March) and House
Bill 112 (approved by the Senate in May), but was adapted to
meet what are seen as the Administration's concerns about
the legislation.
"The Senate has twice shown that we want this oversight and
I honestly believe that a majority of the House membership
wants to pass legislation that provides the essential
regulatory review of the proposed Highmark and Independence
Blue Cross merger," Senator White said. "However, it's clear
that the House majority leadership is closely aligned with
the Governor on this issue. While he's made it clear that he
does not like our proposals, the Governor has never said
exactly what's wrong with the legislation, nor has he
offered meaningful alternative language of his own."
A key provision within HB 966, as with the previous
versions, is the requirement that any merger involving the
"Blues" be subject to approval by the Department of
Insurance. While the Insurance Department would hold final
approval -- or denial -- authority for a merger of
non-profit health insurance companies, the bill also
establishes an Insurance Restructuring Public Interest
Review Board comprised of representatives from the Auditor
General's Office, the Administration, and the four caucuses
of the General Assembly, as well as a policyholder to
provide recommendations to the Department.
Two additions to the latest bill include a requirement that
the board make its recommendations no later than August 31,
2008 and a sunset provision that would disband the board 90
days after the Department of Insurance ruling on the merger.
In response to concerns by Banking and Insurance Committee
members about the previous bill, the amended version of HB
966 drops a requirement that the Department of Insurance
develop a written determination that the merger or
consolidation will result in a "sustained reduction in
health care premiums." Instead, the Department must
determine the merger will provide "sustained benefits."
Finally, the legislation removes the requirement for a
retroactive review of the total amount the non-profit
organizations dedicate to social mission.
"I hope these changes will finally give us the momentum to
push this legislation forward," Senator White said. "The
lack of communication with the Governor on this important
issue leads me to fall back on the wise words of Yogi Berra
who said, 'You've got to be very careful if you don't know
where you're going, because you might not get there.' But,
in this case, the millions of Pennsylvanians who are
policyholders of Highmark and IBC can not afford for us to
'not get there.' The competitive marketplace that ensures
quality services and reasonable prices can not afford for us
to 'not get there'."
"We need to 'get there' as quickly as possible," Senator
White said. "We need to establish clear oversight powers
regarding this merger and so it is 'déjà vu all over again'
and we are working for the third time to put this
legislation in place. We take this issue seriously and I
hope the House and Rendell Administration also will."
Print this page
E-mail
this page

Back |